Types of Static Error

Types of Static Error:

The static error of a measuring instrument is the numerical difference between the true value of a quantity and its value as obtained by measurement, i.e. repeated measurement of the same quantity gives different indications. Types of Static error are categorized as gross errors or human errors, systematic errors, and random errors.

Gross Errors:

These errors are mainly due to human mistakes in reading or in using instruments or errors in recording observations. Errors may also occur due to incorrect adjustment of instruments and computational mistakes. These errors cannot be treated mathematically.

The complete elimination of gross errors is not possible, but one can minimize them. Some errors are easily detected while others may be elusive. One of the basic gross errors that occurs frequently is the improper use of an instrument. The error can be minimized by taking proper care in reading and recording the measurement parameter.

In general, indicating instruments change ambient conditions to some extent when connected into a complete circuit.One should therefore not be completely dependent on one reading only; at least three separate readings should be taken, preferably under conditions in which instruments are switched off and on.)

Systematic Error:

These errors occur due to shortcomings of the instrument, such as defective or worn parts, or ageing or effects of the environment on the instrument.

These errors are sometimes referred to as bias, and they influence all measurements of a quantity alike. A constant uniform deviation of the operation of an instrument is known as a systematic error. There are basically three types of systematic errors

(i) Instrumental,

(ii) Environmental, and

(iii) Observational.

(I) Instrumental Errors

Instrumental errors are inherent in measuring instruments, because of their mechanical structure. For example, in the D’Arsonval movement, friction in the bearings of various moving components, irregular spring tensions, stretching of the spring, or reduction in tension due to improper handling or overloading of the instrument.

Instrumental errors can be avoided by

(a) selecting a suitable instrument for the particular measurement applications. (Refer Examples 1.3 (a) and (b)).

(b) applying correction factors after determining the amount of instrumental error.

(c) calibrating the instrument against a standard.

(II) Environmental Errors

Environmental errors are due to conditions external to the measuring device, including conditions in the area surrounding the instrument, such as the effects of change in temperature, humidity, barometric pressure or of magnetic or electrostatic fields.

These errors can also be avoided by

(i) air conditioning,

(ii) hermetically sealing certain components in the instruments, and

(iii) using magnetic shields.

(III)Observational Errors

Observational errors are errors introduced by the observer. The most common error is the parallax error introduced in reading a meter scale, and the error of estimation when obtaining a reading from a meter scale.

These errors are caused by the habits of individual observers. For example, an observer may always introduce an error by consistently holding his head too far to the left while reading a needle and scale reading.

In general,. systematic errors can also be subdivided into static and dynamic errors. Static errors are caused by limitations of the measuring device or the physical laws governing its behavior. Dynamic errors are caused by the instrument not responding fast enough to follow the changes in a measured variable.

Random Errors

These are errors that remain after gross and systematic errors have been substantially reduced or at least accounted for. Random errors are generally an accumulation of a large number of small effects and may be of real concern only in measurements requiring a high degree of accuracy. Such errors can be analyzed statistically.

These errors are due to unknown causes, not determinable in the ordinary process of making measurements. Such errors are normally small and follow the laws of probability. Random errors can thus be treated mathematically.

For example, suppose a voltage is being monitored by a voltmeter which is read at 15 minutes intervals. Although the instrument operates under ideal environmental conditions and is accurately calibrated before measurement, it still gives readings that vary slightly over the period of observation. This variation cannot be corrected by any method of calibration or any other known method of control.

SOURCES OF ERROR

The sources of error, other than the inability of a piece of hardware to provide a true measurement, are as follows:

1. Insufficient knowledge of process parameters and design conditions

2. Poor design

3. Change in process parameters, irregularities, upsets, etc.

4. Poor maintenance

5. Errors caused by person operating the instrument or equipment 6. Certain design limitations

MORE RELATED ARTICLE

COPYRIGHT © 2014 TO 2018 EEEGUIDE.COM ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | HOME | SITEMAP | CONTACT US | ABOUT US | PRIVACY POLICY | Frontier Theme